Search Results for "Test identification parade"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 4(2) and 8 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i), 363, 354-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Umesh Sanghele, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for offences under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Gang Rape and Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Prosecutrix Testimony. Failure to Identify Accused and Contradictory Medical Evidence Led to Benefit of Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Nakul Trimbak Bhangare, Ulhas Shankar Bhanushali, Suresh Budhaji Raut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by independent evidence.

The case involves three appeals filed by Darshan Harbans Singh, Jamin Sharafat Khan, and Jayesh @ Bachchi Jeetnarayan Singh against their conviction u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The case pertains to the murder of Sunil Anant Durge, the younger brother of Raju Durge, a Municipal Corporator. The appellants, Deepak Chavria, Sangr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to provide consistent description and no independent corroboration of recovery.

The appellant, Rakesh Harilal Kahar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai on November 30, 2001, in Sessions Case No.250 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony was inconsistent and not supported by other evidence.

The appellant, Aiwan Sonaji Ranshur, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the mur...