Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tahsildar enquiry"

764 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 764 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding — Upholds Tribunal's Order Based on Sufficiency of Evidence and Natural Justice. The court held that the findings of the enquiry officer were not perverse and the Tribunal's order did not warrant interference under Article 226 of the Constitution.

20 Dec 2006

The petitioner, Hanumanprasad Durgaprasad Mishra, was appointed as a Junior Clerk on a purely temporary basis on 22 July 1981 and posted at the Govern...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenants' Petition in Watan Land Tenancy Dispute — Remand for Enquiry Under Section 32P(2)(b) or (c) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The court held that the precise date of payment of occupancy price after regrant was crucial to determine whether the tenants' right to purchase revived, and remanded the matter for factual enquiry.

18 Dec 2015

The case involves a dispute between tenants and landlords over agricultural land that was originally watan land. The tenants sought to purchase the su...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Order of Remand in Agricultural Tenancy Cases as Being Unwarranted When No Evidence of Tenancy Existed. The Court Holds That Remand for Fresh Enquiry is Impermissible Under Principles Analogous to Order XLI Rules 23 and 23A of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, When the Revisional Authority Concludes That There Is No Material to Prove the Claim of Tenancy Under Section 70(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

1 Nov 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with 128 writ petitions filed by landowners challenging a common order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order Declaring Kishanrao Kadam as Tenant; Landlord Relies on Earlier Civil Decree and Findings of Tenancy Authorities

4 Jul 2012

...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Encroachment Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Petitioner Directed to Avail Statutory Appeal Before District Collector. Disputed Facts Regarding Temple Ownership Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction When Alternative Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act Exists.

8 Apr 2026

The petitioner, K. Manmathan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challenging a final no...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Minister's Revision Order in Fair Price Shop Licence Cancellation Case. Revisional Authority Cannot Enlarge Scope of Revision; District Supply Officer's Cancellation Order Restored.

31 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Balbhim Sukhdeo Limbkar, filed a complaint against respondent No.4, Manisha Nagesh Shinde, who was running a fair price shop. The Tahs...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Revenue Order in Land Dispute Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Directs Fresh Consideration After Hearing Petitioner. Failure to provide notice and opportunity of hearing before cancelling patta and ordering eviction renders order illegal under principles of natural justice.

22 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Sugumaran, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to quash the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge’s Order Upholding State Minister’s Decision in Evacuee Property Mutation Dispute. Minister's Order Had Set Aside Lower Authorities' Orders Restoring Evacuee Property Entries.

13 Jul 2005

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from a dispute over evacuee properties in Lonavala. The original owner, Haji Habib Tar Mohammed Janu, migrated to Pak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Matter — Purchase Certificate Under Section 32M Upheld Despite Delay in Section 32F Application. The court held that the application under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond two years from the landlord's death, and the purchase certificate under Section 32M is conclusive.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioners, claiming to be tenants of a suit property, initiated proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Revenue Authorities for Failing to Execute Decree Despite Supreme Court Confirmation. Court Directs Tahsildar to Execute Decree Within Six Weeks, Imposes Costs for Vexatious Litigation.

7 Jun 2019

The petitioner, Gangabai Ramrao Patil, entered into an agreement to sell land with the respondents in 1973. When the respondents failed to execute the...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)