Search Results for "Sole Eye-Witness"

484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Inconsistencies in Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Hanumantharayappa, was convicted by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in Sessions Case No. 81/2013 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti Ninaji Ghule, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, for the murder of his niece-in-law, Sharda, under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was an interested witness and medical evidence contradicted his version.

The appellant, Sk. Mohin Sk. Munshi, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Sk. Rais Sk. Gani. The prosecuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Atmaram Ganpat Medgottalwar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli for the murder of Vacchalabai under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Asif Pasha @ Asif, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, for the murder of one person under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's account was inconsistent and lacked corroboration, leading to benefit of doubt.

The appellant, Deepak Pralhad Shejwal, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Sham Gade and sentenced to life impr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as medical evidence contradicted prosecution version and identification was doubtful.

The appellant, Hanmant Nagnath Gavali (Bhosale), was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for the murder of Bhagwan, and senten...