Search Results for "Security Cheque"

686 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 686 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Notice. Complainant failed to establish financial capacity and valid demand notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Ghanshyam D. Katira, was the original complainant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Court holds that presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of complainant once issuance and signature of cheque are admitted, and accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Ranjit Singh Sethi, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Abdul Jalil Sha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case Due to Failure to Prove Legal Enforceability of Debt. The Court Found That Presumption Under Section 139 Did Not Extend to Legal Liability as Complainant Could Not Prove Partnership Profits Through Profit and Loss Account or Balance Sheet.

This was a criminal appeal filed by the complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the judgment of acquittal passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's Evidence Insufficient to Establish Debt Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Chikkachowdappa, against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 held to be in favour of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Sachin Food Processor, a registered partnership firm, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Sanjay T. Pathak, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Lack of Proper Service of Notice. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Legally Enforceable Debt and Notice Was Not Properly Served.

The revision petition was filed by the accused against his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for dishonour of a ch...