Search Results for "Section 375 IPC"

162 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 162 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Rape and Cheating Case Against Applicant in Matrimonial Portal Dispute — No Prima Facie Case of Rape or Deception Established. Relationship was Consensual and Complainant was Aware of Applicant's Marital Status and Identity.

The applicant, Nandan Sadanand Bendarkar, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Rape Cases Based on Promise of Marriage. Distinguishes Between Breach of Promise and False Promise Under Section 376(2)(n) IPC.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur Bench heard three applications for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Oral Sex on Minor Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Contradicted by Medical Evidence and Mother's Testimony.

The appellant, Rahul Shingade, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli in POCSO Case No.1/2015 for offences under Section 376(2)(i)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Perfunctory Section 313 Examination. Promise of Marriage Not Proven as False from Inception; Relationship Consensual and Delayed FIR Raises Doubts.

The appellant, Maheshwar Tigga, was convicted under Sections 376, 323, and 341 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the Additional Judicial Commissioner,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Rape of Minor Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony Found Credible and Age Proved by School Records. The court held that minor contradictions do not discredit the victim's evidence and the presumption under Section 29 POCSO Act applies.

The appellant, Akash s/o Devanand Tempe, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal (POCSO) Case No. 198/2016 for the offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Promise-to-Marry Rape Case — Lack of Evidence of False Promise. Consent Based on Promise to Marry Not Vitiated When Promise Was Not False from Inception Under Section 376 IPC.

The applicant, Rajesh Sankarsan Tripathy, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashment of FIR No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Excluding Paternity — Scientific Evidence Overrides Circumstantial and Testimonial Weaknesses in Rape Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f),(i),(j) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Govind alias Hemrab s/o Mahadeo Deolkar/Deulkar, was convicted by the learned Designated Judge, POCSO Act and Additional Sessions Judge...