Search Results for "Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Section 32(1) Indian Evidence Act"

224 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 224 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Two Women Judicial Officers Terminated During Probation in Madhya Pradesh — Termination Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Recruitment Rules. The Court held that termination based on adverse remarks without opportunity of hearing violates Article 311 and Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 1994.

7 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated three connected matters concerning the termination of six women judicial officers (Civil Judges, Junior Divisio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Guarantors in Bank Fraud Case Due to Settlement — Wives of Main Accused with No Active Role Entitled to Relief. Settlement of Civil Dues and Lack of Specific Role Justify Quashing of Charges Under Section 482 CrPC.

4 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Bharthi Devi and another (Accused Nos. 3 and 4) against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Sections 212(6) and 217 of Companies Act, 2013 and Cognizance Order. Petitioners sought declaration that sections unconstitutional and quashing of arrest warrants issued by the Special Court in SFIO complaint.

15 Apr 2024

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditors' Appeals in SARFAESI Act Case on Appointment of Advocate as Commissioner. The Court held that a District Magistrate or Chief Metropolitan Magistrate can appoint an advocate to take possession of secured assets under Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as an advocate is considered an officer of the court subordinate to the Magistrate.

25 Feb 2022

The dispute centered on the interpretation of Section 14(1A) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Will Dispute — Upholds High Court's Finding of Non-Genuine Will Due to Suspicious Circumstances. The court affirmed that the propounder of a Will must dispel all suspicious circumstances, and the High Court's reversal of the Trial Court's decree was justified based on inconsistencies in evidence.

24 Apr 2020

The case involves a civil appeal by the plaintiffs-appellants against the High Court of Karnataka's judgment dated 26.10.2007, which reversed the Tria...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Conspiracy, Cheating, Forgery, and Corruption in Fake Balance Certificate Scam. Trial Court Convicted Bank Manager and Proprietors for Creating Fraudulent Credit Entries and Balance Certificates to Facilitate Loan of Rs.36 Crores.

14 Jan 2020

The present criminal appeals arose from a common judgment of conviction and sentence rendered by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bengaluru, in Spl.C....

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Common Judgment on Cross Appeals Against Order Partly Setting Aside Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute. The Court examines whether the Single Judge correctly assessed claims arising from a Build-Operate-Transfer road project, considering the State's argument on suppressed Office Note and extension of toll collection period.

4 May 2018

These appeals arise out of a common order of a single Judge of the High Court dated 12 February 2015 in three arbitration petitions challenging an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

21 Dec 2017

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds Compensation Determination Under Indian Telegraph Act for Land Diminution Due to Transmission Tower Erection. District Court's Award of Compensation for Diminution in Land Value Upheld in Revision Petitions Under Section 115 of CPC.

30 Sep 2015

The matter arose from a batch of miscellaneous petitions filed by landowners under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, seeking compensati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)