Search Results for "Section 163-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 163-A"

182 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 182 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased Driver's Income Reassessed at Minimum Wage with Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier. The court held that in the absence of income proof, minimum wage notification should be adopted, and future prospects of 40% and multiplier of 18 are applicable for a 21-year-old bachelor.

9 Mar 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 28.12.2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Rajula, in M.A.C.P. No. 863 ...

High Court

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Passenger — Negligence of Driver Proved, Future Prospects and Consortium Awarded. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not adding future prospects and in awarding inadequate consortium, enhancing total compensation from Rs. 4,17,500/- to Rs. 5,80,400/- under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

5 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 30.03.2016 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Bhuj at Kuchchh, in M.A.C.P....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased. Multiplier of 15 under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 held applicable based on deceased's age of 35 years.

13 Oct 2022

The State of Maharashtra, through the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Conversion of Claim Petition from Section 166 to Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act in Fatal Accident Case. Claimants entitled to compensation under no-fault liability despite deceased's own negligence.

28 Jun 2022

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, dismissing M.A.C.P No.645 of 2006 filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Subsequent Petition Under Section 22 of Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Maintainable Despite Dismissal of Earlier Motor Vehicles Act Claim on Ground of Self-Negligence. The Court held that the two Acts operate in different fields and the dismissal of the earlier petition does not bar a claim under the Employee's Compensation Act.

1 Aug 2017

The case involves an appeal filed under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 (formerly Workmen's Compensation Act) by the legal represe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Condonation of Delay in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim — Inordinate Delay of 628 Days Not Properly Explained. Claimant Failed to Provide Sufficient Cause for Delay in Filing Appeal Against Dismissal of Claim Petition for Son's Death.

30 Sep 2015

The appellant, Kanthamma A.C., filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act seeking compensation for the death of her son Harsha in a road traf...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Negligence Established by Involvement of Vehicle. Claimants Awarded Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Death of Deceased in Road Accident.

6 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the widow, minor son, and mother of the deceased Prakash Deorao Patil, against the judgment and order d...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Apportionment of Liability Between Insurers Upheld. Claimant allowed to amend petition from Section 163A to Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and compensation enhanced from Rs. 4,50,000 to Rs. 8,50,000 with interest.

6 Jan 2014

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by Smt. Omana Chetan, widow of S.R. Chetan, who died in a road accident involving a lorry and a car....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim. Non-Joinder of Minidor's Owner and Insurer Does Not Vitiate Claim as Tribunal's Negligence Finding Was Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

13 Aug 2013

The case arises from a motor accident on 8/2/2003 when Manoj Mahadeorao Yete, aged 21, was traveling as a passenger in a minidor (MH29/2963) from Bori...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Limits Owner's Liability to Rs. 50,000 Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Claimants' Failure to Prove Negligence Renders Claim Under Section 166 Unsustainable; Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication Under No-Fault Provision.

30 Nov -0001

The present appeals arise out of a motor accident claim case. The appellant in First Appeal No.523 of 2016, Pawan s/o Gulchand Musale, is the owner of...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)