Search Results for "SARFAESI Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "SARFAESI Act"

415 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 415 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Legal Heirs of Borrower. Court Holds That Legal Heirs Are Bound by Mortgage and Cannot Challenge Section 13(2) Notice After Delay and Without Availing Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioners, legal heirs of Smt. Sudha Avdhut Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the proceedings initiated by the Central Bank of India unde...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC — Suit for Specific Performance Not Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose from Refusal to Execute Sale Deed in 2018.

4 Sep 2025

The appellants, Sri K.T. Govinde Gowda and Smt. G. Anuradha, filed a Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

19 Dec 2024

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Setting Aside Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Auction Purchaser's Rights Upheld as Sale Was Completed and No Material Irregularity Found. The Court held that once a sale certificate is issued and full consideration paid, the sale cannot be set aside without impleading the auction purchaser and proving material irregularity or fraud under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act.

5 May 2023

The case involves an appeal against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, which set...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — Extension of Time Not Binding Without Confirmation Letter. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Under Rule 9(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

10 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) against the judgment of the Madras High Court. The dispute arose from...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Validity of Sale Notice Where Fraud or Irregularity Alleged. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act does not oust civil court jurisdiction when the challenge is based on fraud or violation of statutory provisions.

12 Aug 2022

The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition by Banks Against Additional District Magistrate's Order Disposing Section 14 SARFAESI Application Without Taking Possession. The Court Held That the Magistrate's Role Under Section 14 Is Ministerial and Cannot Adjudicate on the Validity of the Underlying Debt or Security Interest.

19 Jul 2022

The petitioners, authorized officers of four financial institutions (IDBI Bank, Axis Bank, Bank of Baroda, and CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd.), ha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Notices Against Axis Bank in Liquidation Proceeding — No Liability for Tax Deducted at Source Under MVAT Act After Company's Winding Up. The Court held that the State cannot recover tax from a secured creditor who had no obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 42 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, as the deduction obligation arises only when payment is made to the dealer, and after winding up, the Official Liquidator is the proper authority.

7 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Axis Bank Ltd., a banking company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Petitioner Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the petitioner had an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, and no exceptional grounds were made out for interference under Article 226.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, acting as a trust, filed two writ petitions under Art...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)