Search Results for "Rule 341"

662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Fails to Establish Membership of Unlawful Assembly or Common Object.

The case involves appeals against a conviction for murder and related offenses. The appellants were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Concurrent Conviction for Wrongful Restraint and Assault. Concurrent findings of fact by trial and appellate courts under Sections 341, 323 r/w 34 IPC upheld as no perversity or illegality found.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by four applicants against their conviction by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dadra and Nag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit Involving Compromise Decree Validity. Dispute pertained to joint family properties and a compromise decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, with allegations of sham nature.

The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court dated 23.11.2011, which had dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Scrutiny Committee's Rejection of Halba Scheduled Tribe Claim. Court Holds That Documentary Evidence from 1923 Prevails Over Anthropological Texts, and Halba and Halbi Are the Same Tribe Under Entry 19 of the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950.

The petitioner, Sanjay s/o Rama Nandanwar, challenged the order dated 31 July 2013 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amrav...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Nagpur Bench Delivers Oral Judgment on Challenge to Parole Rule. The Court examined whether the proviso to Rule 19 of the Bombay (Furlough and Parole) Rules 1959, restricting parole to once a year except in death cases, violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

These writ petitions, filed by convicts in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, challenged the constitutional validity of the proviso...