Search Results for "Resettlement Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...

Search Results for "Resettlement Act"

445 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 445 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Impleading Orders in Land Acquisition References — Reference Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Allowing Impleading Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Without Adjudicating Title. The Court Held That the Land Acquisition Act is a Complete Code and Third Parties Must Establish Title Before a Civil Court.

20 Dec 2024

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi, presided over by Justice, delivered a common judgment on 20 December 2024 in three connected writ petitions...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Allotment of Balance Land to Project Displaced Person under Resettlement Act. Cancellation of Allotment Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

30 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Manik Chandru Deokar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Project — Petitioners Failed to Demonstrate Violation of Statutory Provisions or Fundamental Rights. The court held that the acquisition was for a public purpose and that the petitioners' remedy lay in seeking enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rather than challenging the acquisition itself.

7 Jul 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Village Wagholi, Pune, challenged the acquisition of their land for a road widening project by the State of Maharas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Applications in Land Acquisition Cases Based on Overruled Precedent. Court held review maintainable under Article 137 of Constitution of India as subsequent Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority overruled earlier Pune Municipal Corporation decision, altering law and providing sufficient reason for review, with matters restored for fresh consideration on merits.

17 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dealt with a group of review applications filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and Delhi Development Authority under Article 137 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute, Quashing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, as Held by Constitution Bench Overruling Prior Precedent.

9 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Government of NCT of Delhi against judgments of the High Court of Delhi that declared land acquisition...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application in Land Acquisition Case Under Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Acquisition proceedings for Peripheral Ring Road lapsed as compensation was not paid nor possession taken before commencement of the 2013 Act under Section 24(2), rendering interim relief infructuous.

20 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings for the Peripheral Ring Road (PRR) around Bangalore, initiated by the Bangalore Development Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in MRTP Act Reservation Lapse Case — Purchaser Entitled to Benefit of Prior Owner's Section 49 Notice. Reservation Lapses Under Section 49(7) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 When No Acquisition Within One Year of Purchase Notice, and Benefit Enures to Subsequent Purchaser.

14 Feb 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the Bombay High Court's order which had disposed of the writ petition filed by the appellants, purchaser...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Project Affected Persons for Resettlement Benefits Under Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999 — Authorities Directed to Level Plots and Provide Amenities. The court held that the government resolution dated 12.8.1967 obligates the authorities to level plots and provide basic amenities, not the villagers.

10 Feb 2010

The petitioners, eight villagers of Jiwnapur, Tahsil Kuhi, District Nagpur, filed a writ petition seeking resettlement benefits under the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Rehabilitation of Project Affected Persons. Notification under Section 11 of Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 and Land Acquisition Act, 1894 upheld as valid.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Shri Balshiram Khandu Pawale and Shri Baban Khandu Pawale, residents of Village Kalus, Taluka Khed, District Pune, filed a Writ Petit...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)