Search Results for "Rent Control exemption"

203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Small Causes Court's Jurisdiction in Rent Control Exemption Case. Section 41 of Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Confers Jurisdiction Over Landlord-Tenant Suits Irrespective of Applicability of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The Petitioner, Depe Global Shipping Agencies Pvt. Ltd., is the landlord, and the Respondent, MPIL Corporation Ltd., is the tenant in respect of suit ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Lease Rent Demand Against Indian Oil Corporation for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. Collector's demand for arrears of lease rent for periods prior to 1995 set aside as time-barred and without authority under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioner, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, challenged a communication dated 14 March 2002 from the Collector, Mumbai Suburban District, demanding...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Educational Institution Challenging Provident Fund Applicability. Establishment Not Exempt Under Section 16(1)(a) or (b) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 as It Uses Power and Employs More Than 20 Persons.

The appellant, M/s. Aniket College of Social Work, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and the Maharashtra Public Trust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...