Search Results for "Recruitment Rules 2010"

888 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 888 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition of Junior Scientific Assistants Seeking Higher Pay Scale Without Promotion. Higher pay scale of Rs. 2000-3200 linked to actual promotion to Senior Scientific Assistant, not automatic entitlement under Circular dated 13.05.2002.

The petitioners, eleven individuals appointed as Junior Scientific Assistants (JSA) with the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) between 1979 and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Promotion Select List for District Judges in Gujarat — Merit-cum-Seniority Principle Upheld. High Court's Suitability Test Components and Weightage Valid Under Rule 5 of Gujarat State Judicial Service Rules, 2005.

The Supreme Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the Select List dated 10.03.2023 issued by the High Court of Gujarat for prom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruit District Judge's Claim for Seniority Over Promotees in Kerala Higher Judicial Service. Notional Seniority Granted from Date of Initial Appointment of Other Direct Recruits in Same Selection.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between direct recruit District Judges and promotees appointed by transfer in the Kerala Higher Judicial Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Promotions Under Municipal Corporation Rules. Requirement to Pass LSGD and Departmental Examinations Under 2010 Rules Held Mandatory, Seniority Alone Insufficient for Promotion.

(1) Background: The petitioners, employees of Kalyan Dombivali Municipal Corporation, held posts of Clerk-cum-Typist cum Computer Operator and were ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Probation Period Extended Validly Under Service Rules. Termination of Probationer Without Stigma Upheld as Employer's Discretion Under Regulation 11 of MSETCL Service Regulations.

The petitioners, Chandrashekhar Tukarampant Madankar, Anup Udhav Lokhande, and Harshal Radheshyam Malewar, were appointed as Junior Engineers (Electri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in MSETCL — Termination During Probation Valid Without Stigma or Mala Fides. Probationer has no right to the post and termination simpliciter during probation does not attract principles of natural justice.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by probationary employees of the Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (MSETCL) chal...