Search Results for "Raiding party"

413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Sanction and Unreliable Trap Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused against the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Misapplication of Section 8 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Charge Framed Under Wrong Provision Invalidates Conviction

The appellant, a Junior Clerk in a Sessions Court, was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for allegedly demanding and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Variance in Witness Testimony on Demand of Bribe Not Material, but Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Baburao Tayappa Mhetre (Respondent No.1) and Elahee Badshah Shaikh (Respondent No.2) by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Japanese National in NDPS Case for Possession of LSD and Charas — Procedural Lapses Not Fatal to Prosecution. The court held that Section 50 of NDPS Act does not apply to vehicle searches, and conscious possession was proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, a Japanese national, was convicted by the Special Judge of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Court, Mapusa, for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance of Section 50 — Search of Bag Not Covered Under Mandatory Procedure. The court held that Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies only to personal search, not to search of a bag, and thus the conviction was set aside.

The appellants, Rehanabi Sheikh Atiq and Sheikh Sohel Sheikh Atiq, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Special (NDPS) Case 2/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal by Accused Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Conviction Challenge Hinges on Proof of Demand and Credibility of Complainant.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Special Court under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellants, Manik Dajibaji Bhatkar (accused no.1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Special Case No.2/88, acquitting the respondent-ac...