Search Results for "Proposed accused"

922 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 922 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamji @ Sunil @ Dakudo S/o Kalubhai Mer, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jetpur at Rajkot, for the murders of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Section 319 CrPC Case — Trial Court Directed to Reconsider Summoning of Additional Accused. Prima Facie Evidence Test Must Be Applied for Summoning Under Section 319 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The petitioner, Renuka @ Shivubai, filed a criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt based on circumstantial evidence and unreliable witnesses.

The appellant, Anil Shrawan More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian Pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manoj @ Manya Pandurang Kadam, Pranay @ Pintya Ramesh Pawar, and Pradeep @ Dadya Atmaram Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Daughter's Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Strangulation Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abbas Nawaj Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his daughter Heena by strangulation. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Outraging Modesty and Assault in Revision Against Acquittal of Other Charges. Minor inconsistencies in victim's testimony do not discredit her credible evidence under Section 354 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Rajesh Swarupchand Kankaria and others (original accused nos.1 to 3) challenging their c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 504, 506, 302 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction and sentence passed by the I Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Manikrao Salunke, was a Naib Tahsildar in Omerga, Osmanabad district. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad, for offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision in Cheating and Forgery Case — Restores Magistrate's Order Issuing Process. Held that the Sessions Court erred in quashing process at the initial stage as there was a prima facie case under Sections 420, 465, 467, 471, 403 read with 120B IPC.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by the original complainant, Rajeev Sawhney, challenging an order dated 13.8.2008 passed by th...