Search Results for "Presidency Small Cause Courts Act"

117 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Refusing Return of Plaint in Suit for Possession of Garage. Court Holds That Question of Valuation and Court Fee Is a Mixed Question of Law and Fact to Be Decided at Trial, Not Under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Ganpat Govind Shigvan, was a defendant in Suit No. 2151 of 2010 filed by the respondent, Preeti Paresh Shah, and her mother for posses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction Order in Lodging House Dispute — Confirms Tenant's Subletting and Unauthorized Construction as Grounds for Eviction Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenges the judgment and order dated 21st November 1998 passed in Appeal No. 45...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Appellate Court's Order Granting Temporary Injunction in Tenant Dispute. District Judge's Power to Reappreciate Evidence in Injunction Appeals Upheld Under Order 39 CPC.

The petitioners, Abidbhai and Musabhai, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 17th January 2014 passed by the District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as contract was executed and performed in Chennai, and arbitration venue was Chennai.

The petitioner, M/s. Roman Tarmat Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an injunction restrain...