Search Results for "Permanent Structure"

480 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 480 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Application Under MOFA — Holds That Competent Authority Cannot Reject Application on Grounds of Missing Documents After Issuing Notice, and That Lack of Occupation Certificate Is Not a Bar to Grant of Deemed Conveyance.

The petitioner, ALJ Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs BMC to Provide Alternate Premises to Disabled Petitioner After Illegal Demolition of Stall. License Under Section 394 of MMC Act, 1888 Does Not Authorize Structure on Public Land, but Demolition Without Notice Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Mohd. Sayed Mohd. Salim Nagori Rizvi, a person with 100% hearing disability, filed a writ petition seeking reconstruction of his stall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Inclusion in Slum Rehabilitation List Due to Lack of Electoral Roll Evidence. Petitioner failed to prove residence as of 1.1.1995, a requirement under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme.

The petitioner, Indu Ramchandra Khanvilkar, claimed to have a hut on survey no.162/162-2/1 to 7, 165/1 to 84 at Village Malad, Taluka Borivli, which w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Possession Against Tenant in Arbitration Dispute — Interim Relief Denied as Disputed Questions of Fact Require Trial

The petitioner, M/s. Gandhi Adhivitiya Combine, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Notice Under Section 478 of BPMC Act. Repair Work by Appellant Not Covered by Section 478 as It Was Not Urgent or Necessary for Safety.

The appellant, Ashok Ambadas Gangane, filed two second appeals against the respondents, M/s. Shubhamangal Builders and Others, and Pune Municipal Corp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act — Unauthorised Construction on Railway Land. Section 5A of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 applies to pre-existing structures as it is procedural and not retrospective in operation.

The petitioner, C. Muthuswami, filed a writ petition challenging an eviction order dated 25.7.2003 passed by the Estate Officer under the Public Premi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Eviction of Unauthorised Occupant from Railway Land. Section 5A of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 applies to pre-existing unauthorised constructions as it is procedural in nature.

The petitioner, Bharat Purohit Mithaiwala, challenged an eviction order dated 25.7.2003 passed by the Estate Officer under the Public Premises (Evicti...