Search Results for "Non-application of Mind"

326 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 326 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PASA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Pending Bail Application, Vitiating Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Hitesh Gopal More, was detained under a preventive detention order dated 28th July 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Dadra & Nag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority.

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Documents. Nephew of detenu successfully challenged preventive detention order under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA on grounds of procedural irregularities and lack of material evidence.

The petitioner, nephew of the detenu Salma Karolia, challenged a detention order dated 30th September 2014 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Suspension of Senior Officer. Suspension order quashed due to non-application of mind and lack of material, considering officer's imminent retirement.

The State of Maharashtra challenged an order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 13 December 2014, which allowed the Original Application...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application. Failure to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention Despite Awareness of Custody Renders Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application — Detaining Authority Failed to Disclose Compelling Reasons for Detention.

The petitioner, Pravin @ Purshottam Shrinivas Mahajan, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 29 April 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...