Search Results for "Multiple Petitioners"

1407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in CPWD Contract Dispute, Holding Retired Departmental Officers Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Former Judge as Sole Arbitrator to Resolve Multiple Contractual Disputes Arising from Six Construction Agreements.

The dispute arose from six separate construction contracts awarded by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) to M/s Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for a Residential Layout. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout Under the Land Acquisition Act and BDA Act.

The provided judgment text is an incomplete excerpt containing only the listing of multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Lack of Notice Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Co-owners Not Served Individual Notice Before Acquisition for Irrigation Project, Violating Section 4(1) and Section 9(3) of the 1894 Act.

The case involves a writ petition filed by three co-owners of agricultural land in Village Nere, Taluka Maval, District Pune, challenging the acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Decision on Quashing of Multiple FIRs in Real Estate Dispute; Developers Contend Breach of Contract, Not Cheating. Court Examines Whether Civil Dispute Can Attract Criminal Liability Under Sections 406 and 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Karnataka High Court heard a batch of criminal petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of mult...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Eviction of Licensee in Landmark Tenancy Case. Interpretation of Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Act Clarified: Shared Licenses Do Not Confer Tenancy Rights.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Petitioners, legal heir of the original defendant, confirming the eviction order passed by ...