Search Results for "Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961"

102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Building Tax Assessment Orders Against Company in Panchayat Tax Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Orders Passed Without Hearing Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Weikfield Agro Products Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders dated 21.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Gram Panchayat Members Challenging Complaint Against No-Confidence Motion. No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch Upheld Despite Pending Appeal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, elected members of Gram Panchayat Mahadulla, moved a no-confidence motion against Sarpanch Smt. Nirmala Bonde on 5-8-2006, which was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Notice Signed by Majority of Total Members of Grampanchayat is Valid Under Section 55(2) of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Shivkant Bangar and Gavlan Tekale challenging the no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Election of Chairmen of Subject Committees of Zilla Parishad. Election by show of hands with alphabetical listing of candidates upheld as valid under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Vishwanath Limbaji Bhowate, was a candidate for the election of Chairman of two Subject Committees of the Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...