Search Results for "MIDC"

765 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 765 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Exparte Decree Case. Court Holds That Liberal Approach Is Required When Delay Is Not Due to Wilful Neglect and Sufficient Cause Is Shown.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by Pushkaraj Wagh (appellant/original defendant) against an exparte decree passed in Spl. Civil Suit No. 22/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Agreement Not a Bar to Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Payment under agreement does not extinguish right to seek higher compensation if agreement was not voluntary or was under coercion.

The appellant, Syed Miya s/o Syed Buran, filed two appeals challenging the judgment and award dated 20.8.1993 passed by the Reference Court, which rej...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 307 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves three appeals against conviction under Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution alleged that on 21.04.2013, th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Appellants' challenge to 1965 acquisition notification filed in 1992 held time-barred under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963 and earlier writ petition dismissal operates as res judicata.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit in 1992 seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of two suit properties bear...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Company Challenging Property Tax Demand by Gram Panchayat on Land Within MIDC Area. Gram Panchayat Cannot Levy Tax on Land Already Subject to MIDC Levy Under Section 124 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act and engaged in manufacturing two and three wheelers, has its registered ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MIDC to Distinguish Water Usage for Manufacturing vs. Allied Activities in Levy of Water Charges. The court held that MIDC cannot levy uniform higher water charges on industrial units without distinguishing between water used as raw material and water used for allied activities.

The petitioner, United Breweries Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging demand notices, water bills...