Search Results for "Legally enforceable debt"

411 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act Restored. Complainant's Evidence Sufficient to Prove Debt and Liability Despite Accused's Defence of Property Dispute.

The appellant, Smt. F. Chandra, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Dishonour of Cheque Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Establish Loan Transaction and Legally Enforceable Debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Smt. Jayamma @ Nagamma (respondent) against Smt. Jayamma (petitioner/accused) under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case but Modifies Sentence to Fine Only. Complainant's Revision for Enhanced Compensation Dismissed as Accused's Liability Already Discharged.

The case involves two criminal revision applications arising from a cheque dishonour matter under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted by accused.

The appellant, Dr. Kailash Charkha, was the original complainant in Summary Criminal Case 160 of 2004 before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant's claim of loan advanced to friend fails as no legally enforceable debt existed, leading to acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Shri Datta S. Nadkarni, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the first respondent, Mr. Salvador Fernandes, from an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Revision in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Debt. Complainant could not establish that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability as invoices were raised in name of third party, not the accused.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the complainant, M/s. Shradha Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd., against the judgment of the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the original complainant, Sandeep Shirodkar, against the acquittal of the accused, Shankar Dhawaskar, ...