Search Results for "Karnataka Value Added Tax Act"

258 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Service Tax on Restaurant Services as Valid Exercise of Union Legislative Power. Service Tax on Supply of Food and Drinks in Restaurants is Not a Tax on Sale of Goods but a Tax on Service, Falling Under Entry 97 of List I.

The case involves two intra-court appeals filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, challenging a learned Single Judge's common order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in VAT Case — Running Bills of Water Supply Board Not Tax Invoices. Karnataka Water Supply Board is not 'Government' under KVAT Rules, hence its Running Bills cannot be treated as Tax Invoices for input tax credit.

The State of Karnataka filed a Sales Tax Revision Petition under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, challenging an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Capital Gains Liability of Firm on Partner's Retirement. Full Bench resolves conflict under Section 45(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding liability when retiring partner receives only money for his share without distribution of assets.

The case involves an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an order dated 02.03.2006 in ITA No.1295/BANG/2004 for the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order Under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejecting Settlement Application for Non-Disclosure of Full Income.

The petitioner, Major Metals Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 30 December 2010 passed by t...