Search Results for "Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Union's Challenge to BMRCL Conduct Rules Due to Appropriate Government Dispute. Central and State Governments Argue Jurisdiction Over Metro Rail Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act.

This batch of writ petitions, filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, centered on the determination o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.19,30,000 for Death of Ganeshan. Negligence of Driver of Insured Vehicle Established, and Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Regional Manager of National Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 22.09.2016 passed by the IX Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by BMTC and Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim — No Negligence by BMTC Driver Established. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the tipper lorry driver was solely negligent, and the compensation of Rs.25,000/- with interest was just and proper.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 19.08.2012 involving a BMTC bus (KA-01-F-4447) and a tipper lorry (AP-07-U-8783). The claimant,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation for Minor Pillion Rider. Negligence of Qualis Driver Established as Sole Cause of Accident, Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 27.3.2009 at about 11:40 am at the junction of Hebbal ring road near Bharath Cancer Hospital, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Single Judge's Directions on Vehicle Seizure under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Holds that Directions Were Reiteration of Rule 202-B and Custody Cannot Be Given to Parallel Operators Including State Transport Corporations.

The respondent, a tourist bus operator with 265 buses, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that his vehicles not be seized except by following th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...