Search Results for "Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules"

93 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Withdrawal of NOC for Mining Activities — Forest Department Cannot Revoke No Objection Certificate Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing and Without Following Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that withdrawal of NOC without notice and hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

21 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Mr. H.K. Lakshman Gowda, filed two writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Kar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rejection of Mining Lease Renewal Application Due to Non-Compliance with Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Consider Petitioner's Explanation Violates Principles of Natural Justice Under Rule 22(5) of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

10 Oct 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Annapurneshwari Minerals, a partnership firm engaged in mining, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitut...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Upholds District Task Force Committee's Power to Cancel Mining Licences for Violations of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994. The court held that the Committee has quasi-judicial authority to revoke quarrying licences for non-compliance with statutory conditions, including illegal transportation and failure to maintain records.

19 Jun 2024

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by several individuals, including Sri S.R. Bellary and Sri A.J. Kalkeri, challenging the reso...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Requirement of Second Forest Transit Pass for Iron Ore Transport from Railway Sliding to Factory Premises. The court held that such insistence was contrary to law laid down in W.P.No.24072/2005 and W.A.No.726/2008, and Rule 3 of Karnataka (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage of Minerals) Rules, 2011.

11 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s Thakur Industries, a partnership firm engaged in mining business, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction for Illegal Sand Mining Under MMRD Act — Revision Petition Dismissed. Petitioner failed to prove ownership of land or valid license for sand extraction, and courts below correctly applied Section 4(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rules 3(1) and 42 of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Parappa S/o Hamappa Lamani, was convicted by the Civil Judge and JMFC, Shiggaon, in C.C.No.497/2013 for the offence punishable under S...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Disciplinary Entrustment Orders Passed Against BBMP Employees After Acquittal in Bribery Cases. Court Finds Government Failed to Apply Mind Under Section 12(4) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 and There Was Inordinate Delay in Initiating Proceedings.

12 Nov 2020

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru adjudicated two writ petitions filed by BBMP employees, K.S. Nanjegowda and N.G. Nataraj, who challenged gove...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes State Order Removing Lands from Mining Lease in Mineral Auction Dispute. Transfer of Mining Lease Valid Under Rule 22(6) of MCR 1960, State Cannot Unilaterally Excise Lease Area for Auction Without Following Due Process.

19 Nov 2019

The petitioner, M/s. J.K. Cement Limited, held a mining lease (ML No. 2344A) over certain lands in Metagudda Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Modifies Condition for Release of Seized Vehicle in KMMC Rules Case — Bank Guarantee Reduced to Simple Bond. The court held that Rule 43(8) of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 is directory and the condition of bank guarantee can be substituted with a simple bond to avoid hardship to the owner.

15 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Mallappa s/o Mayappa Idali, is the owner of a vehicle seized in connection with an offence under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concessio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Geologist in Mines & Geology Department — Upalokyukta's Report Lacks Prima Facie Evidence. Petitioner's suspension set aside as the Upalokyukta's recommendation was based on an unverified complaint and the State's order was mechanical without independent application of mind.

16 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Fayaz Ahmad Shaikh, a Geologist in the Mines & Geology Department, Bagalkot, challenged two orders: (1) an order dated 31.12.2016 pass...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)