Search Results for "KVAT Act, 2003"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Canara Bank's Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encumbrance Created by Commercial Tax Department on Mortgaged Property. Priority of Bank's Mortgage Over Statutory Charge Under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Upheld.

The petitioner, Canara Bank, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the St...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Assessee's Appeal in Sales Tax Case — Revisional Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Penalty under Section 8(3)(b) of CST Act, 1956 Quashed as Assessee Was Not Given Opportunity to Cross-Examine Driver of Vehicle.

The appellant, M/S Apotex Research Private Limited, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed a Sales Tax Appeal under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Sales Tax Case — Re-assessment Not Permissible Under Rectification of Mistake. The Court held that rectification under Section 69 of the KVAT Act cannot be used to re-assess escaped turnover without following the procedure under Section 39.

The petitioner, M/s. Hema Engineering, a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1)...