Search Results for "Intimidation"

781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in POCSO Case Due to Suppression of Material Facts and Failure to Consider Gravity of Offence -- High Court's Bail Order Set Aside as Perverse and Unjustified

The Supreme Court allowed the criminal appeal challenging the High Court's bail order in a case involving serious sexual offences against a minor -- T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Act Proceedings Against Accused Due to Lack of Intent to Humiliate Based on Caste. Allegations of Caste-Based Insults Found to Be Vague and Not Made in Public View, Failing to Attract Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v-a) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

The petitioner, Prakash Patil, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the FIR dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Charges Under SC/ST Act for Lack of Caste-Based Insult and Public View Requirement. Allegations of Land Dispute Do Not Attract Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act as Insult Not on Account of Caste and Incident Occurred Inside Building Not in Public View.

The appellant, Hitesh Verma, challenged the order of the High Court of Uttarakhand dismissing his petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Criminal Trespass Case, Holding Possession of Vacant Land and Intention to Annoy Are Sufficient. Supreme Court Rules that Complainant’s Physical Presence at Time of Trespass is Not Required Under Sections 441/447 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

This appeal by special leave arose from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Criminal Revision No. 188 of 1966, which had acquitted the respondent...