Search Results for "Interest Pendente Lite"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Interest Pendente Lite"

320 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Condonation of 586-Day Delay and Grant of Leave to Appeal to Pendente Lite Purchasers in Specific Performance Suit. The Court held that subsequent purchasers who purchased property during pendency of suit and in violation of injunction cannot claim bona fide status and have no right to appeal after their impleadment application was rejected and became final.

1 Jan 2025

The case involves appeals by the original plaintiffs (H. Anjanappa & Ors.) against an order of the Karnataka High Court condoning a delay of 586 days ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

29 Apr 2024

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order Allowing Impleadment in Regular Appeal — Assignment of Decree Without Court Permission Invalid Under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC. The court held that any assignment or creation of interest pendente lite requires prior permission of the court under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC, and without such permission, the assignee cannot be impleaded as a party.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, who were plaintiffs No.2 to 6 in a suit, filed a Regular Appeal (R.A.No.31/2022) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM at R...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

7 Feb 2025

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Mortgagee Bank in Admiralty Suit Regarding Priority of Claims Over Vessel Sale Proceeds. Court Has Power to Fix Time Limit for Filing Claims Against Sale Proceeds to Ensure Finality and Expeditious Distribution.

30 Nov 2012

The appellant, Sparebanken Sogn Og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel M.V. Bos Angler and its owners seeking enfor...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether a Bond Executed by a Company Director Constituted a Contract of Guarantee or Indemnity Under Section 126 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Court Also Examined the Binding Nature of a Scheme of Composition Sanctioned Under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956 on Dissenting Creditors.

17 Sep 1969

The case involved a cash-credit account opened by the first respondent company with the appellant bank. On June 7, 1953, the company executed a promis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Case — Doctrine of Lis Pendens Applied to Protect Plaintiff's Rights Despite Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. The Court held that an alienation made during the pendency of a suit is void against the decree-holder under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, and that the First Appellate Court could not record a finding on fraud and collusion without cross-objections by the defendants under Order 41 Rule 22 CPC.

14 Oct 2024

The dispute arose from an agreement to sell dated 17.08.1990 executed by defendant no. 1 (Janraj Singh) in favour of the plaintiff (Daljit Singh) for ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Developer's Appeals in Consumer Disputes Over Delayed Possession — Compensation Modified to 9% Interest Per Annum in Line with Consent Orders. The Court held that the developer is entitled to a three-year completion period and compensation for delay shall be at a uniform rate of 9% per annum, not the higher rates awarded by the NCDRC.

10 May 2019

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) concerning d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows PWD's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Road Construction Contract Dispute. Court Upholds Damages Beyond 1% Cap Due to Contractor's Abandonment but Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 9% Simple.

12 Jun 2026

The case arises from three arbitration petitions filed by the Public Works Department (PWD) of Maharashtra under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restrains Subsequent Purchaser from Alienating Property During Pendency of Suit. Doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies to subsequent purchaser who bought property during pendency of suit for specific performance.

9 Oct 2013

The appellant, M/s. Rehab Housing Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 16 April 2006 against the original o...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)