Search Results for "Industrial Court discretion"

1580 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1580 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Finding of Violation of Sections 25F and 25G, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, But Questions Reinstatement Relief. The Court Examines Whether Reinstatement with Back Wages Is Mandatory for a Daily-Wager Illegally Retrenched from a Temporary Afforestation Scheme.

The writ petition arose from a challenge by the employer, the Social Forestry Department of the Government of Maharashtra, against the concurrent orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Cases Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Labour Court at Mumbai Held to Have No Jurisdiction Over Employees Working Outside Mumbai Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Abbott Healthcare Private Limited and others, filed three writ petitions challenging identical orders passed by the Industrial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows BEST's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practices — Increments and Leave Benefits for Daily Wagers Upheld Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BEST), challenged a judgment and order dated 17th October 2019 passed by the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946. Employer Failed to Prove Voluntary Abandonment of Service; Termination Without Specific Order Held Illegal.

The petitioner, M/s. Empire Dyeing, a textile processing company, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Permanency for Hospital Employee — Industrial Court's Finding of No Continuous Service Upheld. Employee Failed to Establish 240 Days of Work in 12 Months Under Section 5-B of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Kumar Dashrath Kamble, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 3 May 2023 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Appeal Against High Court's Modification of Industrial Tribunal Award in Termination Case. Temporary Tube-well Operator's Services Terminated by Fisheries Department Under Industrial Disputes Act.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 18.07.2006 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 2588 of 1998, which up...