Search Results for "Indian Income Tax Act 1922"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Indian Income Tax Act 1922"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.

8 May 2015

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Department's Find that Colliery Sale Profits Are Business Income and Disallows Carry Forward of Ice Factory Loss. Isolated Transaction of Prospecting and Selling a Coal Mine Held to be Business Activity Under Income Tax Act, 1922, and Loss Cannot Be Carried Forward After Cessation of Business.

20 Feb 1969

The assessee, a private limited company, carried on multiple businesses including coal mining and a dry ice factory. It obtained a prospecting licence...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal, Holding Compensation for Partial Termination of Agency is Capital Receipt. Termination of Agency for Territory Outside Hyderabad State Results in Sterilisation of Capital Asset, Not Taxable as Business Income Under Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.

20 Mar 1959

The dispute arose from the income tax assessment of Messrs. Vazir Sultan & Sons, a registered firm, for the assessment year 1951-52. The firm was appo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Charges Against Directors in Income Tax Search Statement Case — Statements Under Section 132(4) of Income Tax Act Not 'Evidence' for Perjury Prosecution Without Complaint Under Section 195 CrPC. Statements made during search under Section 132(4) are deemed to be in a judicial proceeding under Section 136 of Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring a complaint by the income tax authority before prosecution for offences under Sections 181, 201, 204 IPC.

12 Oct 2010

The petitioners, husband and wife and directors of companies, were accused of offences under Sections 181 (false statement on oath), 201 (causing disa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Reference on Validity of Penalties for Non-Payment of Advance Tax and Self-Assessment Tax by Trust Claiming Charitable Exemption. The Tribunal Upholds Penalties Under Sections 273(2)(a) and 140A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Despite Assessee's Reliance on Supreme Court Precedents Regarding Charitable Purpose Exemption.

4 Aug 2017

The assessee, a trust founded in 1941, published newspapers and periodicals with stated charitable objects for the welfare of people from Kutch, Kathi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Dispute Regarding Tribunal's Jurisdiction to Remand on New Grounds. Tribunal Has Power Under Section 33(4) of Income-tax Act, 1922 to Entertain New Arguments and Order Remand Despite Procedural Rules.

22 Sep 1966

The Supreme Court addressed five consolidated civil appeals arising from a reference made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Bombay Bench 'A'. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Revenue's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Penalty Notices Under Section 271DA on Limitation Grounds. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of Section 275 of Income Tax Act in Cases Where Penalty Is to Be Imposed by an Authority Other Than the Assessing Officer.

7 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from orders passed by a single judge of the High Court of Karnataka in ten writ petitions. The respondents, individual assessees and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Assessee in Income Tax Act Case Due to Arbitrary Stay Provision. The Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Was Struck Down as It Automatically Vacated Stay Orders After 365 Days Without Considering Assessee's Responsibility for Delay, Violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

6 Apr 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of civil appeals concerning the constitutional validity of the third proviso to Section 254(2A) of the In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Reopening Case — Notice Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid. Reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 within four years held bad in law when based on change of opinion regarding deduction under Section 36(1)(viii).

9 Jul 2012

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Mumbai (revenue) under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 27/8...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

23 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)