Search Results for "ITAT Justification"

73 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for AY 2007-2008. Failure to Assess Consideration Under Distribution Agreement Constitutes Income Escaping Assessment.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It entered into a Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Income Tax Commissioner's Petition for Full Pension and Retiral Benefits. Rule of 50% Deduction for Less Than 10 Years Qualifying Service Under Rule 49(2)(b) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 Not Applicable to Petitioner Who Served Over 30 Years.

The petitioner, B.B. Rajendra Prasad, a retired Commissioner of Income Tax, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Central Administrati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Charitable Trust for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Framji Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanatorium, is a public charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Delay in Challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Order. Challenge to 2007 ITAT order filed in 2012 dismissed as grossly delayed without sufficient explanation.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on 1 October 2012 challenging an order of the Inc...