Search Results for "Hindu Succession Karnataka Amendment"

155 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 155 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition to Implead Daughter in Final Decree Proceedings Under Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC — Amendment to Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Confers Coparcenary Rights on Daughters Born Before 2005

The petitioner, Smt. Honamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 4.6.2014 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower appellate court's decree confirming plaintiff's title and possession based on sale deed and adverse possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The original plaintiff (sin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...