Search Results for "Hindu Succession Act, 1956"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pre-emption Claim Under Section 22 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 — Testamentary Succession Bars Intestate Right. Property Devolution by Will Excludes Statutory Right of Pre-emption as Section 22 Applies Only to Intestate Property.

The case involves a dispute over a suit property (Plot No.21, Laxmi Nagar, Nagpur) originally purchased by late Kashinath Subhedar in the name of his ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Partition Suit — Upholds Finding That Properties Were Self-Acquired. Daughters Granted Equal 1/6th Share Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 as Father Died Intestate.

The case involves a partition suit filed by three daughters (Plaintiffs) against their brother (Defendant No.1) and others, seeking a share in propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Adoption and Inheritance Dispute. Court holds that the plaint discloses a cause of action and raises triable issues regarding adoption and limitation, warranting a full trial.

The plaintiff, Usha Ramrao Bhojane, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the adopted daughter of the late Laxman Shegaonkar and the late Yam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Hindu Succession Case — Daughter Entitled to Equal Share in Ancestral Property. Court holds that a married daughter is a coparcener under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and notional partition cannot defeat her rights.

The case involves a dispute over ancestral properties between a sister (respondent/plaintiff) and her brother's family (appellants/defendants). The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Restores Trial Court's Decree of Declaration of Ownership and Injunction. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Improper Appreciation of Evidence Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court, which re...