Search Results for "Formal defect"

265 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 265 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Instigation or Active Participation. Mere harassment or cruelty without direct instigation does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

The judgment concerns two criminal petitions for bail and a writ petition filed by the petitioners, E S Praveen Kumar and Eediga Srikanth, who were ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit in Property Dispute Due to Misdescription of Property. Error in Describing Sites Constitutes a Formal Defect Under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.

The petitioner, Satish Daniel, was the plaintiff in O.S. No.71/2017 before the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Raichur, seeking declaration of ownership and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Collector's Order Refusing to Dismiss Disqualification Petition for Non-Compliance of Rule 6 of Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Rules, 1987. Verification of Petition and Documents Held Sufficient Compliance with Rule 6.

The petitioner, Fazalur Rehman Gulam Nabi, President of Municipal Council, Balapur, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Collector, Akola...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...