Search Results for "Forest Offence"

302 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 302 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for strangulation of wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from Sessions Case No. 19/2015 decided by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Godhra, whereby the appellant-accused P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Invalidates Post Facto CRZ Clearance Policy Issued by Union Government. “Environmental Law Cannot Endorse Post Facto Approvals”

The Bombay High Court addressed the legality of an Office Memorandum issued by the Ministry of Environment, Forest, and Climate Change, which allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as circumstantial evidence did not form complete chain pointing to guilt.

The appellant, Sitaram Laxman Dhoom, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for the murder of his sister-in-law Pushpa and for causin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Wild Elephant Electrocution Case Due to Lack of Evidence Linking Accused to Electrified Fencing. Conviction under Wild Life Protection Act, Indian Electricity Act, and IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization of Unauthorized Power Connection.

The appellant, Shivappa, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Spl. Case No.140/2009 for offences under Sections 39 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Cognizance in Wildlife Offence Case. Trial Court's Order Taking Cognizance Under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Restored as Sessions Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction.

The State of Karnataka, represented by the State Public Prosecutor, filed a criminal revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in Wildlife Offence Case — Truck Not Automatically Government Property Upon Seizure Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. Interim Custody Granted Pending Trial as Forfeiture Requires Conviction Under Section 51 of the Act.

The applicant, Jagjeet Singh Kalsi, filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class,...