Search Results for "Fiduciary Capacity"

104 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 104 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Unilateral Registration of Revocation of General Power of Attorney. Registration of a deed of revocation of GPA by the Sub-Registrar without notice to the original holder is illegal and arbitrary, and the court declared it null and void.

The petitioner, North Roof Ventures Private Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the regist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Government Order Declining Enquiry Entrustment to Lokayukta in Corruption Case. Section 14(3) of Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Mandates Entrustment of Enquiry Once Complaint is Made Against Public Servant.

The petitioner, the Registrar of Karnataka Lokayukta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Failure to Establish Criminal Intent Under Section 420 IPC. Allegations of Fraud in Real Estate Transaction Found to Be Purely Civil in Nature, Lacking Ingredients of Criminal Breach of Trust or Cheating.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had dismissed the appellants' petition to quash criminal pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...