Search Results for "Extension of time"

87 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 87 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds High Court Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 29A(4) of Arbitration Act for Extension of Time. The term 'Court' in Section 29A(4) is interpreted to mean the High Court, not the Civil Court, to ensure uniformity and avoid multiplicity of proceedings.

The case arose from a dispute between Jagdeep Chowgule (appellant) and Sheela Chowgule & Ors. (respondents) concerning the jurisdiction to entertain a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Written Statement Filing in Civil Suit — Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Held Directory Not Mandatory. The court declined to interfere under Article 227 as the trial court's order was not perverse or illegal.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit (O.S.No.6032/2017) pending before the XXVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Extension of Time to Deposit Sale Consideration in Specific Performance Decree. Doctrine of Merger Applies When Appellate Court Restores Trial Court Decree Without Fixing Time for Deposit.

The case involves four connected civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 09.09.2022, which dismissed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Execution Court's Power to Extend Time for Deposit in Specific Performance Decree Despite Delay. Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 vests jurisdiction in the court executing the decree to extend time and reject rescission where decree-holder was ready and willing.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18.05.2005. The trial court decreed the suit in part, directing ref...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Default Bail Appeals in UAPA Case — Extension of Investigation Time Valid Despite Procedural Irregularities. Supreme Court Had Restored Extension Order, Charge-Sheet Filed Within Extended Period, Hence No Indefeasible Right to Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC.

The case involves two criminal appeals challenging a common order dated 28th June 2022 passed by the learned Special Judge, NIA, Greater Mumbai, rejec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree for Specific Performance of Contract Due to Non-Deposit of Balance Consideration. Appellant failed to deposit balance amount within extended period under Section 28 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, leading to dismissal of appeal.

The case involves a First Appeal filed by defendant no.1(iii), a legal heir of original defendant no.1, challenging a decree for specific performance ...