High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petitions Filed by Maharashtra Public Service Commission Regarding Recruitment Appointments. Specific Decision and Legal Findings Not Available in Provided Text.
3 May 2025...
Search Results for "Excluded Child"
299 result(s) found
Found 299 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Declares Adopted Son's Alienations Not Binding on Widow's Share. Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Sections 14 and 6 applied to protect widow's pre-existing right of maintenance and partition.
12 Mar 2024The case involves a second appeal by the legal heirs of the original plaintiff, Housabai, against the judgment and decree of the 3rd Additional Distri...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Adoption and Hindu Succession Rights Upheld. Plaintiff's 1/2 share in suit properties declared, sale deeds by adopted son held not binding on adoptive mother.
12 Mar 2024The original plaintiff, Housabai, filed a suit for partition and separate possession of suit lands, claiming a 1/2 share as the widow of her husband w...
- 52
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.
13 Jan 2023The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...
- 532
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Nomination for Village Panchayat Election Due to Three Children. Section 14(j-1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Bar Not Applicable as Petitioner Had Only Two Children Born After Specified Date.
7 Dec 2022The petitioner, Meena Babu Darade, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of her nomination for the election of the village panchayat of Nafa...
- 117
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Hindu Marriage Act Divorce Case, Upholding High Court's Finding of No Cruelty. Appeal Under Family Courts Act Held Timely as Section 29(2) of Limitation Act Applies, Not Section 29(3), and Allegations of Cruelty Fail Due to Respondent's Justified Absence from Matrimonial Home.
3 Feb 2022The dispute arose from a marriage solemnized under Hindu rites on 29-08-1999 between the appellant-husband and respondent-wife. The appellant filed a ...
- 302
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Order in POCSO Act Case Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 23. Journalists' Prosecution for Publishing Victim's Identity Without Proper Authorization Fails as Sanction Requirement Not Satisfied.
17 Sep 2021The petitioners, Gangadhar Narayan Nayak and Nagaraj Ganapati Naik, were accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Special Case No. 25/2018 pending before the Additiona...
- 198
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Examines Appeal and Cross-Objection Against Partial Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Adoption and Revenue Entries. The court considered the maintainability of the appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in light of the alternative remedy of revision under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.
1 Aug 2017The suit O.S. No.57/2010 was filed by the plaintiff (appellant in RFA No.4174/2012) before the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bagalkot, seeking declara...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Adjudicates Regular First Appeal and Cross Objection Against Trial Court's Partial Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Court Addresses Maintainability, Adoption Validity, and Ancestral Property Claims.
1 Aug 2017The Regular First Appeal and Cross Objection arose from a judgment and decree of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bagalkot, in O.S. No.57/2010, a sui...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...
- 11
