Search Results for "Erroneous and Prejudicial"

186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Disciplinary proceedings initiated without prior sanction from the Central Government are invalid as the officer was not removable from service without such sanction.

The petitioner, Shri Nai Pal Singh, an employee of the Income Tax Department working as Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative), file...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — Tribunal's Order Not Erroneous or Prejudicial to Revenue. Transfer of Shares for Debt Settlement and Lease Premium Income Treated as Capital Receipts, Not Revenue.

The appeal by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) dated 21...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Notice Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Limitation Period Expired for Original Assessment Order. Reassessment Order Does Not Extend Limitation for Revising Original Assessment Under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Ashoka Buildcon Ltd., challenged a notice dated 30 April 2009 issued by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Nashik under Section 263 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...