Search Results for "Disorderly conduct"

116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Bank's Petition to Forfeit Gratuity of Employee Terminated for Misappropriation. Misappropriation of Funds by Bank Employee Constitutes Offence Involving Moral Turpitude Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Justifying Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity.

The petitioner, Bank of India, challenged the orders of the controlling authority dated 30 June 2004 and the appellate authority dated 4 September 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Terminated Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Loss of Property or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority/Industr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Labour Court's Finding of Perversity in Enquiry Officer's Findings. Court upholds that perversity of findings is a jurisdictional fact and Labour Court's conclusion was based on evidence.

The Petitioner-Bank challenged the order of the Labour Court dated 1 September 2023 in Complaint (ULP) No.58 of 2014, which held that the enquiry agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Compulsorily Retired Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Willful Offence or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

The petitioner, Bank of Maharashtra, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 197...