Search Results for "Dishonour of cheque"

160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes 10% Interim Compensation Order Under Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Petitioner Not a Drawer of Cheque. Section 143A applies only to drawer of cheque, not to accused who is not drawer.

The petitioner, V. Krishnamurthy, proprietor of Raghvenk Industries, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Specific Averments. Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 Requires Specific Allegations of Role in Conduct of Business.

The petitioners, comprising a company and its directors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to prove legally enforceable debt not established.

This is an appeal by the complainant against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash Process in NI Act Case Against Sick Company's Managing Director. Court holds that declaration of a company as sick under SICA does not absolve its directors from criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Omesh Keshav Karnik, Managing Director of Phoenix Fine Chem Pvt. Ltd., a sick company, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bomba...