Search Results for "Dilatory tactics"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of CPC Application in Eviction Appeal Under Karnataka Public Premises Act. CPC Provisions Not Applicable to Summary Proceedings Under Section 10 of the Karnataka Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1974.

The petitioner, T.V. Sathyanarayana Gupta, was an alleged unauthorized occupant of a shop in a municipal complex in Pavagada Town, Tumakuru District. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Cooperative Society Dispute, Upholds Single Judge's Order Directing Joint Registrar to Decide Application on Merits. Frivolous and prolonged litigation erodes faith in justice delivery system.

The appellant, Sri G. Krishnamurthy, had been involved in a long-standing dispute with the MICO Associates Housing Cooperative Society Ltd. The appell...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSFC's Petition Challenging DRAT Order Granting Cross-Examination in Loan Recovery Case. Right to Cross-Examine Affidavit Deponent Is a Valuable Right Not Barred by Rule 12(6) of DRT Procedure Rules.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Adverse Orders in Service Matters — Held That Committee Must Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Passing Adverse Orders.

The petitioners, employees of the Postal Department, filed writ petitions challenging adverse orders passed by the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate ...