Search Results for "Defence quota"

88 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 88 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging District Judge Recruitment Notification for Lack of PwD Reservation. Court Directs Compliance with 3% Reservation for Persons with Disabilities in Future Selections Under Section 33 of Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995.

The petitioner, M. Ponniah, who suffers from locomotive disability due to polio, filed a writ petition challenging the notification dated 01.05.2013 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Visually Disabled Candidate Denied Job Gets Relief: Supreme Court Orders Appointment in Coal India Case (2026 INSC 53) Procedural technicalities like “expiry of recruitment panel” cannot defeat justice.

Sujata Bora, a visually impaired candidate, applied for a Management Trainee post in Coal India in 2019 under the disability quota. She cleared the se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheating Case — Promise of Government Job for Payment Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Complainant's testimony found unreliable and contradictions in prosecution evidence led to acquittal under Section 420 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment dated 21-3-1997 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to a corruption trap laid by the Anti Corruption Bureau, Beed, against Rajendra Dhondiba Jogdand (accused no.1), an Agricultural Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...