Search Results for "DRT interim relief"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Directs Banks to Comply with RBI Prudential Framework for Stressed Assets Resolution in Writ Petition by Borrower Company. The court held that the RBI circular dated June 7, 2019, is binding on banks and that the borrower has a right to seek a review meeting under the framework.

The petitioner, Ganjam Nagappa and Son Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decision on Auction Sale: Statutory Violations Render Sale Null and Void. Despite recognizing significant procedural breaches, the Supreme Court offers the appellant a chance to retain the industrial property by settling liabilities.

The legality of an auction sale conducted by the Tahsildar and confirmed by the Additional Collector, which was later contested on the grounds of stat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in SARFAESI Matter Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Petitioner Had Already Filed Applications Under Section 17 Before DRT, Rendering Writ Petition Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, Chandrashekar H.S., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Against Bank's Possession in SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenancy Dispute Must Be Adjudicated by DRT, Not Magistrate Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.

The petitioner, Amit Mohan Bhatia, claiming to be a tenant of a property secured by Maratha Sahkari Bank Ltd., filed an intervention application befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrowers' Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act Held Efficacious. Petitioners Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal for Relief Against Recovery Actions.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by borrowers (Arun Dattatraya Narake and others) against the Authorized Officer of Kolhapur Dist...