Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "DRT Procedure Rules"

143 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Allotment Under KIAD Act, Upholding Allotment to Highest Bidder. Petitioner's Claim to Land as Successor to Mining Lease Rejected as Previous Court Orders Concluded Against It and Allotment Was Lawful Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by M/s Katwa Udyog Limited (KUL) challenging the allotment of land measuring 305 acres and 7 guntas at Na...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal by State Bank of India Against Single Judge Order Directing Release of Title Deeds, Holding That Bank Has a Lien Over Deposited Title Deeds Under Section 171 of the Contract Act, 1872, and That the Borrowers Must Repay the Loan Before Seeking Return of Documents.

4 Apr 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the State Bank of India (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge dated 20.06.2024 in W.P.No.201339/202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Technical Defect in Demand Notice Not Fatal When No Prejudice Caused. The Court held that a mere inadvertent use of a different group company name on the demand notice does not invalidate proceedings under the SARFAESI Act if the borrower was not misled and no substantial prejudice was caused.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a dispute between M/s. L&T Housing Finance Limited (appellant) and M/s. Trishul Developers and another (respondents) concerning ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanction Order Not Required to Be a Speaking Order. Court held that the sanction order under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 need not contain detailed reasons and can be based on material placed before the sanctioning authority.

12 Jul 2018

The petitioner, Nandlal Chaturvedi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 29th Jan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MPID Act Appeal for Return of Seized Property to Accused Pending Trial — Property Not Proceeds of Crime Under MPID Act. Court holds that Section 3 of MPID Act does not authorize continued retention of property not linked to deposits, and directs release of vehicle and cash to appellant subject to conditions.

30 Nov 2017

The Bombay High Court allowed Criminal Appeal No. 813 of 2016 filed by Suresh Raju Shetty, challenging an order of the Designated Court under the Maha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRT Orders Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 17(7) Available. Petitioners, as tenants of secured asset, cannot bypass statutory appellate remedy by invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

8 Aug 2017

The petitioners, who were tenants of a property that was a secured asset of the respondent HDB Financial Services Ltd., filed securitisation applicati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Decree-Holder in Execution Proceedings, Setting Aside Dismissal as Time-Barred. The court held that filing chamber summons and other applications constituted steps in aid of execution, extending limitation under Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

18 Oct 2016

The case involves an appeal by Pratap G. Somaiya (the appellant/decree-holder) against an order dismissing his execution application as time-barred. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Sales Tax Auction of Property Already Secured Under SARFAESI Act. Securitisation Act Overrides State Revenue Recovery Laws Under Section 35, and Sale Must Be Conducted by Secured Creditor.

17 Nov 2011

The petitioners, Viraat Ispat Limited and another, challenged an auction notice dated 13 September 2011 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Sales ...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)