Search Results for "Container"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Container"

363 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 363 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Essential Commodities Act Case — Offences Under Sections 3, 7, 8, 9, 10 of the Act Held Bailable. The court held that since the primary offences under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 are bailable, anticipatory bail can be granted even if other non-bailable offences are alleged.

10 Dec 2020

The applicants, Vikrant Angolkar (an employee of M/s Jay Anand Food Industries) and Bhimashankar Khade (a commission agent), filed anticipatory bail a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Non-Prosecution in Dock Safety Case — Acquittal of Stevedores Upheld for Lack of Evidence of Responsibility for Worker's Accidental Death. The court held that the appeal must be decided on merits even in absence of appellant and found no evidence to establish respondents' responsibility for safety measures under the Dock Workers (Safety, Health and Welfare) Act, 1986.

8 May 2017

The appeal was filed by U.K. Das, Deputy Director (Safety) and Inspector Dock Safety, against the judgment of the learned Additional Chief Metropolita...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Weapon Use. The court held that absence of criminal antecedents, sudden quarrel, and no weapon used justified pre-arrest bail under Section 438 CrPC for offence under Section 302 IPC.

10 Jan 2017

The applicant, Ganesh Sitaram Gawari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case: Inland Haulage Charges Covered Under Article 8 of India-Belgium DTAA. The Court held that income from inland transport of cargo to port for international shipping is part of shipping income and not taxable as business profits.

17 Jul 2014

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

28 Jun 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Quia Timet Action for Passing Off Based on Distinctive Bottle Shape of Vodka. Shape of a bottle can be protected as a trademark or get-up if it has acquired distinctiveness and is likely to cause confusion.

2 May 2011

The plaintiff, Gorbatschow Wodka KG, a German company manufacturing Vodka, filed a quia timet action against John Distilleries Limited alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Representation Not Considered Before Confirmation. Failure to Consider Representation Before Confirmation Under Section 8(f) of COFEPOSA Renders Detention Invalid.

4 Aug 2006

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2.4.2004 passed under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute Cases, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the lower appellate court failed to frame substantial questions of law and erred in reversing the trial court's decree without properly addressing the burden of proof regarding adverse possession under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three second appeals arising from a property dispute in Goa. The appellants, Narendra Pandurang Chatim and Vandana Narendra Chatim, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Enforcement Directorate Appeals in FERA Contravention Cases Due to Lack of Evidence and Limitation. Held that mere suspicion cannot substitute proof and that adjudication proceedings under FERA must be initiated within a reasonable time.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India through the Enforcement Directorate against orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Fore...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)