Search Results for "Confiscation proceedings"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision Against Sessions Court Order Setting Aside Confiscation of Edible Oil Stock. Essential Commodities Act Confiscation Proceedings Quashed as Edible Oil Not Covered Under Gujarat Essential Articles Orders.

The State of Gujarat filed two criminal revision applications under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision Application in Essential Commodities Act Case — Confiscation Order Quashed Due to Amended Definition of Solvent. Pit Oil and Spray Oil Not Covered Under Solvent Order, 2000 as Amended in 2001, Rendering Confiscation Without Jurisdiction.

The case involves a Criminal Revision Application filed by Shayona Petrochem Ltd. challenging an order of confiscation dated 9-11-2004 passed by respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Confiscation Order Under Section 130 of CGST Act for Lack of Mens Rea — Petitioner's Goods and Conveyance Seized During Inter-State Transport, Order Set Aside as Proceedings Under Section 130 Require Intent to Evade Tax, Not Mere Technical Irregularity.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Pampapathy Enterprises, a proprietorship firm represented by its proprietor Sri Imamahusen Majaresab Mannanavar, was transp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Seized Vehicle in Sand Transportation Case - Orders Release on Payment of Royalty and Penalty. Seizure under Section 48(8) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 invalid without prior adjudication of unauthorised extraction under Section 48(7).

The petitioner, Neha Agre, filed a criminal writ petition seeking release of her vehicle (MH20AK7558) which was seized while carrying sand one brass i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Customs Duty Case. Settlement Commission's order upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 127H of Customs Act, 1962 granting immunity from interest.

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...