Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Concurrent findings of fact"

83 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 83 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Adverse Possession and Benami Transaction. The court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession, and the defendants established adverse possession for over 12 years, rejecting the claim of benami ownership under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

7 Jan 2025

The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs (respondents) and the defendants (appellants) over 5.82 acres of land in Survey No. 211/1....

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Recovery Suit — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Title and Possession. The Court held that the plaintiff, who purchased property from co-owners, cannot recover possession without establishing his title and the defendants' possession as trespassers, and the concurrent findings of fact by lower courts cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

7 Jan 2025

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of possession and damages against the respondents/defendants 2 and 3 in respect of a property that w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent findings of fact are not perverse.

3 Sep 2018

The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the appellate court in a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent and Mandatory Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove possession and title over suit property; courts below correctly held that respondent was in possession and had constructed boundary walls and tin shed.

21 Mar 2018

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent and mandatory injunction filed by the appellant (original plaintiff) against the respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title Over Suit Property.

9 Nov 2017

The case involves a property dispute between two branches of the same family. The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of own...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Letters Patent Appeal against decree for possession and mesne profits dismissed as no substantial question of law or perversity found in concurrent findings of fact.

31 Mar 2017

The present Letters Patent Appeal arises from a judgment and decree passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No. 133/1976, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Article 227. Suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over disputed property.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff Joaquim D'souza, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title Over Disputed Property.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Leelavati Baburao Chaudhari, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. The court held that a second appeal cannot be entertained on questions of fact when both lower courts have concurrently found that the plaintiffs proved their title and possession over the suit property.

30 Nov -0001

The case pertains to a property dispute between the appellants (defendants) and the respondents (plaintiffs) over a piece of land in Sankhalim, Goa. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Execution of Decrees Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Cooperative Courts. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution, it cannot interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless perverse or without jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed in execution proceedings und...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)