Search Results for "Causal Connection"

108 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order in Drug Offender Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Preventive Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Set Aside as Delay of 40 Days Between Arrest and Order Remained Unexplained.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Thirumoorthy, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention. Delay of 38 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Matheshwari, mother of the detenu Jeganraj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Case — Live Link Between Grounds and Purpose Snapped. Unexplained delay of 19 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Ramani, mother of the detenu Kannan, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 35 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Srinivasan, father of the detenu Indhu @ Indumathi, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Preventive Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 51 days between arrest and detention order held to snap live link, rendering detention invalid under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Pavithra R, the elder sister of the detenu Ajith Kumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Due to Unexplained Delay Between Arrest and Detention Order. Unexplained Delay of Over One Month Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Invalid.

The petitioner, Rani, mother of the detenu Sidharaj, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Detention Order Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Between Arrest and Detention Order Was Snapped.

The petitioner, Sumathi, mother of the detenu Dhanushkumar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Improper Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by Under Postal Certificate (UPC) is not valid service under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The present petition was filed by the original accused, Digambar Abhiman Gondwale and Jayshree Abhiman Gondwale, under Section 482 of the Code of Crim...