Search Results for "CIPLA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CIPLA"

95 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Employee to Engage Legal Practitioner in Departmental Enquiry Despite Company Rules Prohibiting It. The Court quashed the order denying legal representation and directed the employer to permit the employee to engage a lawyer, holding that denial violates natural justice when the presenting officer is legally trained.

21 Aug 2023

The petitioner, T Ramesh Babu, a retired employee of United India Insurance Company Limited, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Industrial Court Order Directing Reinstatement of Workmen in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer Challenges Order Alleging Denial of Cross-Examination and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Recognition Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

17 Oct 2025

The writ petition arose from an industrial dispute between L. G Balakrishnan & Bros Ltd., a manufacturer of chain kits, and its workmen represented by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

30 Oct 2015

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Finding That Treating Holidays as Leave Constitutes Change in Service Conditions. Employer's Notice to Treat All Holidays Including Weekly Holidays as Leave During Leave Period Held to Be a Change in Service Conditions Requiring Notice Under Section 9A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

13 Jun 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Bennet Coleman & Co. Ltd., issued a notice to its employees proposing four measures to maintain discipline. The fourth measure st...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking Investigation Under Section 212 of Companies Act, 2013 Against Azim Premji and Others — Petition Held Not Maintainable Due to Lack of Personal Cause of Action and Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Section 213 of Companies Act, 2013.

12 Feb 2021

The petitioner, India Awake for Transparency, a non-governmental organization, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Order on Maintainability of Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. The court held that an order refusing to try maintainability as a preliminary issue is not a final order and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

25 Jan 2005

The petitioners, Dattaram Panchal and others, filed a complaint before the Labour Court at Mumbai alleging that the first respondent, M/s. Nirlon Limi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practice in Denying Government Resolution Benefits to Non-Teaching Staff. Employer's Failure to Implement Government Resolution Dated 13-5-1999 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 5 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, J.K. Education Society, an educational institution, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.61...

High Court

Writ petition challenges the Industrial Court's declaration that the Municipal Corporation committed unfair labour practice by denying ex-gratia payment to striking workers. The dispute involves interpretation of items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, regarding discriminatory denial of a long-standing annual festival payment.

8 Aug 2012

Petitioner No. 1, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, a statutory authority under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, employs over 14...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Remand Order in MRTU & PULP Act Case — Maintainability of Complaint Must Be Decided on Merits Without Remand. Relationship of Employer-Employee Must Be Admitted or Undisputed for Complaint Under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act to Be Maintainable.

19 Oct 2018

The petitioners, employees of the Forest Department, filed Complaint (ULP) 13/2010 before the Labour Court, Yavatmal, alleging unfair labour practices...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award Reinstating Employee in Industrial Dispute — Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contract Labour Claim. The court affirmed that the Labour Court had jurisdiction and that the termination was unlawful, ordering reinstatement with back wages.

2 Aug 2014

The Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and its officers filed a writ petition challenging an award dated 30.8.2005 passed by the Labour Court,...

5 6 7 8 9

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)