Search Results for "CENVAT Credit"

85 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union's Appeals in Advance Authorization IGST Exemption Case. The Court upholds the pre-import condition as a valid policy measure to prevent double benefit and cash blockage, reversing the Gujarat High Court's decision.

The case involves appeals by the Union of India against a Gujarat High Court judgment that set aside the mandatory 'pre-import condition' for claiming...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue Appeals and Allows Assessee Appeals in Customs and Excise Classification Dispute. Classification of goods under Customs Tariff and Central Excise Tariff determined based on technical literature and expert opinion, rejecting revenue's reclassification.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise and by M/s Twenty First Century Wire Rods Ltd. The core i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of CVD Paid on Imported Mobile Phones Under Exemption Notification. The court held that the exemption notification No.12/2012-Customs applies to imports and directed reconsideration of refund claims subject to verification of unjust enrichment.

The petitioner, Micromax Informatics Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, imported mobile handsets during July 2014 to June 2015 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in MVAT Refund Case — Entitled to Refund of Unutilized CENVAT Credit Under Rule 52A of MVAT Rules. Court directs State to process refund within four weeks.

The petitioner, CEAT Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of unuti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order on Maintainability of Settlement Application Under Section 32E of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Holds That Order of Adjudication Is Made on Date of Dispatch, Not Date of Signing

The petitioner, M/s. Vishnu Steels, a manufacturer of excisable goods, challenged an order of the Settlement Commission dismissing its application und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Condonation of Delay Beyond Statutory Limit in Central Excise Appeal. Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944 Provides an Outer Limit of 30 Days for Condonation, Which Cannot Be Extended by Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, M/s Raj Chemicals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to con...